juvenilelifers.com

 


The U.S.Supreme Court, in the 2012 Miller v. Alabama case ruled that it is unconstitutional to sentence juveniles to mandatory life without parole.


Should Miller v. Alabama be applied retroactively?

ABSOLUTELY


Pennsylvania has the largest population of juveniles 17 years old and under sentenced to life without parole in the United States-480.  Philadelphia County has 150 juveniles sentenced to life without parole who are 17 or under.




The Pennsylvania Constitution states that a juvenile is a child up to the age of 21 years old.


The Supreme Court cited that the human brain is not filly formed until a person is 25 years old.


In addition to featuring juvenile lifers 17 and under, this site will show 18-21 year olds, a small representation of many who deserve to have their life without parole sentences vacated. Roxanne Severcool was sentenced at 17 years old, but What about Cyd Berger, Marilyn Dobrolenski and Avis Lee and many who deserve the same opportunity?

The U.S. Supreme Court, in the case Miller v. Alabama,  ruled that sentencing a juvenile to a mandatory sentence of life without parole is unconstitutional, violating the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The high court ruled that judges issuing sentences must consider the offender’s level of maturity and emotional development. Mandatory life without parole sentences are no longer legal, however the sentence can be imposed at the discretion of the judge.


When Ed Rendell was the mayor of Philadelphia, he legislated that cases involving the death sentence or life without parole be tried by public defenders, not court appointed attorneys. Prior to that, judges appointed attorneys, often with little or no litigation experience. Even now, there aren’t enough resources to use public defenders exclusively.



  

© Mary DeWitt www.marydewitt.net  www.lifersontile.com


More repression of speech.

Revictimization Relief Act, which would allow victims, District Attorneys, and the Attorney General to sue people who have been convicted of “personal injury” crimes for speaking out publicly if it causes the victim of the crime “mental anguish.”